Waxy.org
Waxy.org is the sandbox of Andy Baio. I run XOXO, built Upcoming, Belong, Playfic and Supercut, helped build Kickstarter, made an album, and some other stuff too.

Contact Me: Email, AOL IM, or follow me on Twitter.

Danger Mouse's The Grey Album MP3s

Posted Feb 11, 2004

DJ/Producer Danger Mouse's The Grey Album fused the vocals and beats from Jay-Z's "Black Album" with music sampled entirely from the Beatles' "White Album." Not surprisingly, EMI served Danger Mouse with a cease-and-desist order yesterday, along with ordering stores and websites to stop selling the album.

As a big fan of borrowed/remix culture, that makes me sad. So I posted high-quality MP3s of the entire album below.

I probably won't be able to host this very long, so please help out by mirroring the files as soon as possible. When you're done, send me an e-mail or post the mirrored URL in the comments. Enjoy, and thank you!

February 12, 2004: I can't host the files anymore, but these alternate mirrors still offer the MP3 DOWNLOADS: Illegal Art, Grey Tuesday mirrors.

February 13, 2004: I was cc'd on an e-mail from EMI's lawyers to my ISP, stating that I'm in violation of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. As such, I have removed all of the MP3s from my web server. The text of the EMI letter is below.

February 19, 2004: Downhill Battle is organizing Grey Tuesday, a day of coordinated civil disobedience in protest of EMI's attempt to squash this album. Even if you don't like this particular remix, or even hip-hop in general, remember what the album represents: the universe of creative works stifled by the United States' archaic copyright laws and the corporations that lobbied for them.

February 23, 2004: The law firm of Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman (representing Capitol Records) has started e-mailing cease-and-desist notices to the websites that are participating in the Grey Tuesday protest tomorrow, whether they're hosting the album or simply changing the colors of their homepage. The cease-and-desist demands that website owners "cease any plans or efforts to distribute or publicly perform this unlawful recording," "identify the names and addresses of any third parties who have supplied you with physical or digital copies of The Grey Album," and "provide Capitol with an accounting of all units of The Grey Album that have been distributed via your website."

The most disturbing part of the letter, sent to people who merely stated their intent to participate is this: "In addition, to the extent that you have already commenced distribution of The Grey Album, you must make payment to Capitol in an amount to be discussed. We demand that you contact us immediately."

Does this sort of preemptive cease-and-desists set a new precedent for record label action? Do website owners have to obey their demands, when they haven't even posted the album yet?

February 24, 2004: Despite legal threats, many sites are participating in the protest. I'll be keeping a running list today of some of my favorite responses so far: Matt Haughey, Ryan Gantz, Lawrence Lessig, Chris Komlenic, Edverb (and his open letter to EMI), University of Iowa professor Kembrew McLeod, Justin Hall, Brian Flemming, Michael Sippey (plus his reply to my comment), Andrew Raff, Joe Gratz, Matt Jones, Scot Hacker.

Jeff Lowenberg
Vice President Operations/Designated Agent
Everyone's Internet
2600 Southwest Freeway, Suite 500
Houston, TX 77098

Re: Unauthorized Use of Sound Recordings Performed by the Beatles

Dear Mr. Lowenberg:

It has come to our attention that Andrew Baio is currently exploiting sound recordings that are owned and/or controlled by Capitol Records, Inc. ("Capitol"). In particular, it appears that Mr. Baio is using, without authorization, on his website, http://www.waxy.org/archive/2004/02/11/danger_m.shtml, (the "Website"), copies of sound recordings embodying performances of the Beatles, including but not limited to recordings of "Long, Long, Long," "While My Guitar Gently Weeps," "Glass Onion," "Savoy Truffle," "Mother Nature's Son," "Helter Skelter," "Julia," "Happiness is Warm Gun," "Piggies," "Dear Prudence," "Rocky Raccoon," "Revolution 1," "Revolution 9," "I'm So Tired," and "Cry Baby Cry" (the "Capitol Recordings").

Andrew Baio's unauthorized exploitation of the Capitol Recordings constitutes copyright infringement, and renders Andrew Baio, and any other company engaged in the unauthorized exploitation of the Capitol Recordings with Andrew Baio, liable for all of the remedies provided by the relevant laws occasioned by Andrew Baio's unfair competition and dilution of our valuable property.

I am the agent authorized to act on behalf of Capitol, the complaining party. It is our understanding that Everyone's Internet, Inc. is the Internet Service Provider for Andrew Baio and the Website, and as such, you are the authorized agent for service of this notice in accord with The Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998, 17 U.S.C. § 512 et seq. (the "DMCA Notice") for Everyone's Internet, Inc.

We request that following your investigation of this matter you provide us full remedy under the DMCA Notice requirement, including but not limited to, expeditiously removing or disabling access to our copyrighted material. Unless we receive full and immediate compliance with this demand within a reasonable amount of time, we will be forced to consider pursuing our other remedies at law and in equity.

This letter is written without prejudice to any of our rights or remedies, all of which are expressly reserved herein.

By placing my signature herein, I state under penalty of perjury that the information contained in this notification is accurate and that I am authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right of the Copyright alleged to be infringed.


Sincerely,

/S/: Jonathan Campbell
This electronic signature is made and adopted with the intent to authenticate this written agreement.

Jonathan H. Campbell
Legal and Business Affairs
EMI Recorded Music, North America
150 Fifth Avenue
11th Floor
New York, NY 10011

221 Comments (Add Yours)

Feb 11, 2004
1:23 PM  
sjc wrote:

Boy, you sure are bold and brave.


Feb 11, 2004
2:56 PM  
Recoil wrote:

awesome. just plain awesome.


Feb 11, 2004
3:30 PM  
Lukas wrote:

Does anybody know what Hov thinks of the Grey Album?


Feb 11, 2004
3:38 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

As far as I know, he hasn't responded to it publicly yet. What does everyone else think of it? Do you like it?


Feb 11, 2004
4:33 PM  
Serena wrote:

Love track 05. 99 Problems (Helter Skelter).Had it on loop all afternoon. Many thanks Andy!


Feb 11, 2004
5:20 PM  
Graham wrote:

Thank you, Andy. Track 6 makes my hinder parts move in interesting ways.


Feb 11, 2004
6:22 PM  
Andre wrote:

to keep the bots at bay: go to torrez.org "slash" media "slash" mp3 "slash" dangermouse

that shouldn't be too confusing, right?


Feb 11, 2004
6:51 PM  
Billy bunny wrote:

Track 3 is awesome, I've gotta say. Thanks for the recommendation (and the downloads).


Feb 11, 2004
8:05 PM  
neece wrote:

Nice sample listing. KTHXBYE


Feb 11, 2004
9:30 PM  
Aaron wrote:

Sweet~! I've been half-heartedly looking for this since haughey posted about it the other day.

Thank you very much fine sir.


Feb 12, 2004
7:58 AM  
Bill wrote:

Thanks for putting these up. They're fantastic!


Feb 12, 2004
10:07 AM  
Brian wrote:

awesome. thanks!!!


Feb 12, 2004
12:18 PM  
Anonymous wrote:

thanks for the tunage!


Feb 12, 2004
12:53 PM  
Francisco wrote:

Will have other mirrors listed here... http://www.forumgeeks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=302


Feb 12, 2004
12:58 PM  
ad hoc wrote:

thanks!


Feb 12, 2004
1:32 PM  
Drupreme Magnetic wrote:

I spoke to my man who works at Roc-A-Fella and allegedly he's loving it. Like my self he's a 30 something hip-hopper disallusioned with the status quo in hip-hop and has started listening to alternative music. The sentiment is a combination of both. Also to be associated with the Beatles is major to old Hovie.


Feb 12, 2004
1:48 PM  
Grandmaster AK wrote:

I read about this album on hiphopsite (they wont comment on it anymore b/c of the cease and desist order) and it said Danger Mouse did not make one beat on his own, EVERYTHING is sampled from The White Album, included the drums, etc. Not just one Beatles' song per one Jay Z song.


Feb 12, 2004
3:16 PM  
Josh wrote:

Why not set up a Bitorrent?


Feb 12, 2004
4:34 PM  
thelonious21 wrote:

this is the shit


Feb 12, 2004
9:28 PM  
TonytoneOneLuv wrote:

Yo Thanks for da hook up, keep doin' whut u do!!


Feb 13, 2004
12:28 AM  
Jules wrote:

Awesome...
Thank you!
thank you!
thank you!


Feb 13, 2004
5:46 AM  
baby wrote:

Danger Mouse loves the Beatles, so do we all, because they could write great songs. Just because most of us can't write like the Beales, it doesn't mean we steal their songs. So why does Danger Mouse have to?


Feb 13, 2004
7:26 AM  
shrntate wrote:

I have been searching for this for a long time. Beautiful!! This is ground breaking. Thanks for putting up the quality tracks.

Keep whacking the armadillo!!


Feb 13, 2004
7:38 AM  
horklog wrote:

Mirrored at horklog. Also available at illegal-art.org


Feb 13, 2004
7:51 AM  
amanda wrote:

way to stick it to Da Man, waxy.org people. ...this is hott.


Feb 13, 2004
7:56 AM  
born an mc wrote:

lovin the cover art:

http://djdangermouse.com/GreyAlbum.jpg



Feb 13, 2004
8:29 AM  
ronxo wrote:

I grew up with Dangermouse and I'll admit, I didn't think he had it in him. Obviously I've been proven wrong. The Ghetto Pop Life CD is hot shit too.


Feb 13, 2004
9:22 AM  
dopethrone wrote:

baby, he didn't steal teh beatles songs, he stole the beatles noize. If Jay-Z is carrying the tune built out of beatles bricks, then DM stole Jay-Z's songs. Except that by releasing the album 'a capella' Jay-Z effectively open-sourced his songs.


Feb 13, 2004
11:09 AM  
Matthew wrote:

I'm also mirroring the album, but downloading from me is slow. regardless: ataxia.net


Feb 13, 2004
11:11 AM  
pdubl wrote:

yo man i got nothin but love and respect for doin so... definetly bold...


Feb 13, 2004
11:34 AM  
sf wrote:

I listened to "what more can I say" and it sucked.
Nothing groundbreaking.
Add a drum machine and mix some bass in too loud and that makes some great music?
I guess people can't even be bothered to sample small parts and stitch them together anymore.

Lazy bastard.


Feb 13, 2004
11:39 AM  
Ed wrote:

About 7-8 years ago, there was a 7" released that took Public Enemy vocals and laid them over Herb Alpert music. It was pretty damn good. The guy's name was Lou Minati (I think).
Anyone seen this? I'd love to be able to get my hands on it again.


Feb 13, 2004
11:42 AM  
Mike wrote:

i absolutely love this album, can't stop listening to it, definitely my favorite remix album, i haven't listened to 9th Wonders take on it yet, if anybody has 9ths email me at thashizzleouttamizzle@yahoo.com


Feb 13, 2004
12:15 PM  
DJ Cresta wrote:

Dope :)

Thanks a lot

very grateful


Feb 13, 2004
1:27 PM  
Bryco wrote:

11. Interlude also has touches of "I'm So Tired" in it. Cool. What a great public service you're running, man. Thanks!


Feb 13, 2004
1:47 PM  
Troy wrote:

I knew this would be too good to last. The Man comes down hard and fast!


Feb 13, 2004
1:52 PM  
Ryan wrote:

You a thug, Baio. A thug. Stick it to 'em.


Feb 13, 2004
1:54 PM  
Jax wrote:

Dude, I used to work for EMI. You're in trouble.


Feb 13, 2004
2:07 PM  
Chris Vincent wrote:

That's just ridiculous. I see they filled out another one of their cease-and-desist templates.

On the sunny side, I like that they used the word "expeditiously".


Feb 13, 2004
2:10 PM  
esch... wrote:

Let's render Jonathan H. Campbell's email useless.
Sign him up for every spam related service you can find.

GO!

-esch...


Feb 13, 2004
2:27 PM  
Eschisadumbass wrote:

Yeah email bombing a man for doing his job is really counterproductive. Your a moron


Feb 13, 2004
2:30 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

I agree, that's not cool. I removed his contact information from the copy of the letter and Esch's comment.


Feb 13, 2004
2:41 PM  
Adam Kontras wrote:

3, 4, 6, 7 and 8.

Gold. The rest is interesting, but man - nothin' beats the groove in #3. Brilliant.


Feb 13, 2004
2:54 PM  
esch... wrote:

whatevs,
just doin his job - that's the biggest cop-out ever.
If jonathan.campbell has to sift through 400 pages of junk email each morning before he can get to dealing with this case then I'm happy.



Feb 13, 2004
2:56 PM  
Anonymous wrote:

thanks for sharing for the time being


Feb 13, 2004
2:58 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

I don't want to be held liable for any harassment of the guy, so please don't post his e-mail address. Thanks.


Feb 13, 2004
2:58 PM  
stx wrote:

Waxy, you're a good person. Well played.


Feb 13, 2004
3:19 PM  
gluey wrote:


Ed, you're thinking of the Evolution Control Committee. I'll post the Chuck/Herb mp3 if you can't find a copy.


Feb 13, 2004
3:57 PM  
GOD wrote:

This CD makes Jay Z actually not SUCK for a while


Feb 13, 2004
4:05 PM  
soulfulelement wrote:

I am currently aware that Capitol themselves are in violation with a particular release on the new Dialated Peoples album. I will not disclose any more info unless you are serious about moving forward with some sort of preceding. There are currently about 5 total people that know the situation, however, myself AND THE ARTIST THEY SAMPLED, are curious about any ideas you guys might have. Our intention is not to bring down Dialated, but to remedy this w/Capitol, after the record has gone big.


Feb 13, 2004
4:43 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

I think you're missing the point a little. Sampling is a very good thing and should be perfectly legal, not crushed under the iron fist of copyright law.


Feb 13, 2004
4:44 PM  
Sucker wrote:

OH MAN!!!! I found this site at work today, emailed the URL home so that I could download the tracks tonight and now this. WHY ME! This is SO typical of my luck!!


Feb 13, 2004
4:49 PM  
Oscar wrote:

Thanks Andy (and Andre).

The famous Public Enemy/Herb Alpert mashup (the one that ostensibly started it all) is available here. It's the first track.


Feb 13, 2004
4:51 PM  
Joe Crawford wrote:

Andy, thank you for the public service you did. It was brave, cool, and is all about artistic freedom.

I commend you.


Feb 13, 2004
5:03 PM  
quattro wrote:

why is 'Lucifer' ommitted?


Feb 13, 2004
7:33 PM  
Instantenemy wrote:

Fuck EMI.


Feb 13, 2004
9:03 PM  
jesus_crowbar wrote:

Sorry that my mirror had to go down, but I got 4gb traffic in less than 12 hours, I got the bash from my host, plus I'm kinda scared of the American justice system... GO NZ!!


Feb 14, 2004
6:55 AM  
hork wrote:

Had the same problem here, JC. Funny how the one surefire guarantee of traffic for a site (other than pr0n) is hosting banned mp3 files... lol


Feb 14, 2004
7:39 AM  
darren wrote:

the story has made it to wired.com

"Copyright Enters a Gray Area"

dw


Feb 14, 2004
9:55 AM  
Destiny wrote:

Another Beatle mash-up has been on the web for months. (o-gay ome-Hay oductions-Pray. Dot co dot UK. Slash tracks dot HTML )


Feb 15, 2004
10:13 AM  
GoLakers112 wrote:

Dear RIAA: This is a big middle finger from us to you! This is what hip hop and DJ culture started with and what it's all about.


Feb 15, 2004
1:09 PM  
Lee Azzarello wrote:

Looks like the illegal art mirror is still going strong. Listening to the whole album now and it's top. It's funny how the Beatles are treated like holy scripture. Sampling beats and clips from recorded music is pretty much an accepted art form now and it's interesting to see which culture guards come out for what cultural product. I love how, in comparison Aesop Rock samples an Argentinian tango trio pretty much verbatim and distributes the record on a national label it isn't a big deal but get mainstream attention by touching Jay-Z the Beatles...watch out kids, the real thugs come out.


Feb 16, 2004
5:26 AM  
bad-L wrote:

(im in a world where musical genius meets lyrical genius, glass onion meets glass pipe, awesome simply awesome)-Bad-L(on Dj Danger Mouse:The Greay Album)


Feb 16, 2004
6:50 AM  
RadScholar wrote:

HOV and The Beetles!?! Who would have thunk it? Man, this is tight!


Feb 16, 2004
1:09 PM  
Matt wrote:

Here's a Grey Album torrent: http://213.158.116.18/torrents/1163/DJ_Danger_Mouse-Grey_Album.torrent


Feb 16, 2004
2:03 PM  
shameful wrote:

where can I get it, all those websites got trashed...I ordered a burned copy on ebay, if I win, I'll host it


Feb 16, 2004
2:04 PM  
Alan wrote:

Thanks for the torrent link, Matt. Excellent, excellent, excellent!


Feb 16, 2004
4:07 PM  
waz wrote:

This mirror is working pretty well.

I will also mirror them on my site when I finish downloading :) (I think I have 15GB spare bandwidth per month, so it should be able to take it)


Feb 16, 2004
5:30 PM  
shameful wrote:

Yo, thanks for the mirror. I will be on tonight sending it out over instant messanger. Drop me a line at WSSkyler and I'll help you out.


Feb 16, 2004
7:04 PM  
G$ wrote:

this album is the best thing that ever happened to sampling....anyone know where i can find the "brown album" ??


Feb 17, 2004
8:09 AM  
rupa the bidi wrote:

the grey album is the shit. sounds beautiful and it really does something to make itself worthwhile. im rather irritated that this shit got cease and desisted because its not like i can get the same thing by like, listening to the White album or something.
People need to recognize that you can create a Brand New piece of art even if you are using elements of other people's art. It's a whole other can of worms about who gets what money, but how can they try to fucking kill a piece of art that is fresh, different, and unique.
This album is a case in point because while made up of recognizable elements, no one can possibly say DM just bit someone elses ideas. dig? my two cents.


Feb 17, 2004
8:49 AM  
Andy S wrote:

Fat red-braced suit full of bugger-all trashes genuine creativity shocker. Such a shame Adam Smith and Milton Friedman were ever born, then these institutionalised bailiffs could never operate. Know this Mr. Campbell - your life's work is as nought - sit at your desk, rake in the cash for nothing and die knowing more people hated you than liked. Musicians will be remembered, not their A&R men, and not their vacuous lawyers. People who have never known you and never will still regard you with contempt. Happy with this?

By the way, arsewit, we still got the tunes. Always going to be a step behind, desparately trying to claw your grubby little pennies back...

Stitch that chunky.

AS, England, can't touch me!!!!!!!


Feb 17, 2004
10:02 AM  
Andy wrote:

Downloaded the whole album and it's awesome !
Shame on the whole music-industry. They are digging their own grave !
EMI should lizence the album and sell it instead of serving Danger Mouse with a cease-and-desist order.
Andy


Feb 17, 2004
10:58 AM  
Jgabs wrote:

Can you email me the mp3's? The white album is my favorite and I am curious to hear these tracks.
Thanks.



Feb 17, 2004
1:40 PM  
constar wrote:

I'm all for sampling, BUT...credit where credit is due!!
Regarding the post above about hitting EMI once the Dialated Peoples album goes 'big', that's exactly the same thing that EMI is doing about this album now. Let's not be hypocrites.


Feb 17, 2004
3:56 PM  
Havoc_on_ice wrote:

Dude, thank u so much for this piece of art, it is the best thing i have heard in a long time. Screw those Capitol bastards!!!!!


Feb 17, 2004
6:36 PM  
DJ Jazzy Geoff wrote:

What a great idea. It's a shame that everyone is so uptight about their music!


Feb 17, 2004
8:23 PM  
otto wrote:

This album is sick. I am sitting hear smiling. So surreal and dreamy the way this works together. I am very happy with it. I agree with whoever said this should be licensed and marketed, not shut down. EMI is missing out.


Feb 18, 2004
2:05 AM  
ian wrote:

Thanks for making it possible to get this, it's great.

Is there something wrong with the burn of track 3 - Encore? At various points (8s, 27s) there are breaks in the sound. Some sound intentional but some sound like they are caused by a glitch in the ripping process.

I've downloaded a couple of versions of the track (from illegal and forum). OK so call me a purist :-)


Feb 18, 2004
10:38 AM  
MP wrote:

This is the shit. Before the Black Album, I was noticing that Jay-Z was spittin game everywhere except his own albums. Then the Black Album dropped. It was tight, but this makes it even better. Best track is Encore. Danger Mouse made a masterpeice.


Feb 18, 2004
10:45 AM  
Ravi wrote:

Where can I find the mp3s of this album? I have a copy of the CD but haven't opened it. I'd like to have a readily available copy so I can bump it in my hooptie.


Feb 18, 2004
11:33 AM  
emmfour wrote:

props! does paul mccartney like it?


Feb 18, 2004
1:05 PM  
Scott Johnson wrote:

Have you received any further correspondence from EMI?


Feb 18, 2004
1:19 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

No, I haven't heard anything. They got what they wanted, so I wasn't really expecting a reply.


Feb 18, 2004
2:05 PM  
brian wrote:

this is the biggest crossover in hiphop/pop history. fucking amazing.


Feb 18, 2004
2:30 PM  
hiphop wrote:

fuck the industry. when artists as a whole stop giving the industry power by not using the established means of production and business, shit like this will happen less. the label doesn't figure the value is worth promoting probably. FUCK'EM. i don't even like Jay-Z...


Feb 19, 2004
8:33 AM  
Albert "Mac" McCluster III wrote:

I'm a music journalist, who concentrates on Hip Hop but, not limited to it...The Grey Album is a revolution in music...combining legends of Rock and Hip Hop with an almost 30 year gap in between the genres...Dangermouse is the next step in Hip Hop and music...much kudos...supporting Hip Hop and Music worldwide..FREE THE MUSIC!
Peace and Safety


Feb 19, 2004
11:58 AM  
The Dude wrote:

Capitol crushes musical innovation while my guitar gently weeps....


Feb 19, 2004
5:30 PM  
baconboy wrote:

Yo guys, I downloaded the album. It's the shit. However, I don't think my ID3 tags are on correctly. Anyone have a track listing for it so I can get it right? Thanks for the help.


Feb 19, 2004
6:40 PM  
Matt wrote:

IT's good, but it's not revolutionary...

NWA was revolutionary. A Tribe Called Quest was revolutionary. This is an innovative quality release, but nothing all that special.


Feb 19, 2004
8:32 PM  
Jess wrote:

Bless your music lovin' heart. Thanks for the grooves and the links...


Feb 20, 2004
12:54 AM  
gman wrote:

Track Listing
1.Public Service Announcement
2.What More Can I Say
3.Encore
4.December 4th
5.99 Problems
6.Dirt Off Your Shoulder
7.Moment of Clarity
8.Change Clothes
9.Allure
10.Justify My Thug
11.Lucifer
12.My First Song


Feb 20, 2004
6:43 AM  
Carsten wrote:

How can one steal something that is not even being sold?


Feb 20, 2004
12:38 PM  
Firas wrote:

Question: does anyone know if the DMCA *requires* C&D letters before legal action? I'd hate to screw up my life over some silly online protest thing.


Feb 20, 2004
5:06 PM  
opinionated wrote:

i must say: i agree with "matt." the grey album is good, but it's not at all a revolution in hiphop music. if anything, it has gotten all this aclaim because it's illegal. the real joint is the BROWN ALBUM, produced by kevBrown. check it out.


Feb 20, 2004
6:27 PM  
Rico wrote:

Went to NYC last week. Got the Grey Album on sum beat hiphop bootleg shop. DAMN this shit is hott.


Feb 21, 2004
7:03 AM  
Josie wrote:

Danger Mouses' 'Grey Album' is the most ridiculous piece of crap to which I have ever subjected my ears... basically, this piece of work is self-styled garbage. I truly feel sorry for any Beatles fan.


Feb 21, 2004
11:41 AM  
andrew wrote:

Does anyone know where I can download MP3's of the Jay Z Brown Album and the Jay Z White album???


Feb 21, 2004
12:00 PM  
Kage wrote:

I've had a beef with the RIAA's unrealistic policies on MP3 downloading, and this is no exception. Danger Mouse should see cash from this, Jay should approve of it, and he should get put on, period. The "Dirt Off Your Shoulder" remix is insane, and I have to call it a tie with what Timmy did...beautiful work. If the links still work, get this stuff now!


Feb 22, 2004
12:58 AM  
joe cent wrote:

Yo this shit is da bomb gangst...u internet dorks just cop it and listen to da ish paycycycye


Feb 22, 2004
7:59 AM  
KEZ wrote:

Superb album, it's all over the p2p programs for those who haven't got it yet :-)


Feb 22, 2004
2:40 PM  
Patric wrote:

The Grey and the rest...


Feb 22, 2004
2:41 PM  
Patric wrote:

The Grey and the rest... http://www.djbattle.net/nyheter.php?articleID=1109


Feb 22, 2004
4:48 PM  
Frank wrote:

I hate the RIAA and their members and I want some of these guys in prison for all the illegal activitiies and the arm the inflict to our society. On Tuesday I wll download the grey Album and guess what? Since they started suing people I started downloading to just to bug them! Don't be intimidated by the RIAA! keep downloading and if sued do not settle! do not give them money! do not pay! As fare as I am concerned think will neither be as before because I will neither either buy any CD or recording from any form if I know that even one peny go to an RIAA member!
I switched completly to Indies. I guess this lawsuit is good for the Indies. I did not know they were there! And guess waht they are sheapper!


Feb 23, 2004
3:49 AM  
IcebergTruPlaya wrote:

****WARNING**** This is for everybody that has downloaded and listened to Jay-Z "The Grey Album" put together by DJ Danger Mouse. After listenin' to this cd myself, I found it to be damn good untill I got to the disturbin' track 11 titled Interlude/Lucifer. If you have listened to this track yourself then you will know that it seems this track appears to be playin' backwards. Well I'm here to tell you that it is and it has a very well distrubin' subliminal message that it's sendin' out. If you have some form of mp3 program that can play songs in reverse on your computer then try it and listen to it yourself, I tried this out usin' Traktor DJ Studio 2. I loaded up the mp3 track 11 in the program and played it in reverse and this is what it started playin', it starts: 666...*disturbin' music plays with talkin' in the background*...I can introduce you to evil...*more music plays*...Murder, Murder Jesus, 666...*more music plays*...Leave niggas on Death's door...*more music plays*...Catholics I gotta murder them...*more music plays*...Murder, Murder Jesus, 666...*music comes to a end*. THIS IS NOT A JOKE PEOPLE!!!! If you have the tools to play mp3's in reverse then try it for yourself and listen. What I don't know is if DJ Danger Mouse added this subliminal message in himself, or if they were actual lyrics by Jay-Z, or something that came from samplings from The Beatles' "White Album." Again people, "THIS IS NOT A JOKE!!!!" I may be the very first person to have discovered this subliminal message in this track and the first to ever give you a warning upon listenin' to this rather disturbin' song. If the webmaster of this site will like to get in contact with me just respond to this message and I'll give you the info to get in contact with me. I will play this track for you personaly if you don't have any program that can play this track in reverse. After listenin' to this track then you will have to make a conscience decission to continue to provide links for this album. Now believe when I say I don't work for or do anything for the RIAA. This is just a warnin' that I'm sendin' out to everyone that is listenin' to this track or that has a child that has this track available to them. Be warned and remember the name.

~IcebergTruPlaya~


Feb 23, 2004
3:56 AM  
Emo wrote:

http://www.greytuesday.org/


Feb 23, 2004
11:05 AM  
Ryan wrote:

IcebergTruPlaya is right about track 11. The
"Murder Murder Jesus" and "Catholics I gotta murder them" lines are kinda disturbing.

I'd say it's Danger Mouse commenting on the long and overrated tradition of backwards devil music (in which the Beatles played a standout role), or else just trying to create controversy. The message and backwards talking seems too obvious otherwise.


Feb 23, 2004
2:48 PM  
Sean wrote:

Well, more of the usual with the thug tatctic from the music industry. Andy has already linked to my site, but I also just added the c & d letter I got:
http://rantings.shaghaghi.net/archives/a_letter_a_day_early.html#more


Feb 23, 2004
3:04 PM  
rv36116 wrote:

I got a letter and am in limbo if I shall place the tunes online or not.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

http://www.RadioAid.com


Feb 23, 2004
4:13 PM  
Hazza wrote:

Cheers for this. I'm surprised at how civilised you guys are though - everyone's really shit scared of authority in the states eh? I'm all up for fucking EMI in the arse in any way I can.


Feb 23, 2004
4:13 PM  
Matt wrote:

I'm planning on adding my c&d letter sometime tonight, although it's identical to Sean's. It's odd that they simply mass-emailed both lists on greytuesday.org - instead of simply reading it, and realizing such action was unnecessary. But then again, it's EMI/Captiol. You can't expect much logical thinking from them.


Feb 23, 2004
4:28 PM  
margaret wrote:

I got a preemptive C&D email today. Can they legally require us to give them a full accounting of how the album came into our posession and what we planned to do with it when we haven't actually put any of the MP3s on our website, just stated our intent to do so in the future? I'm 14, and this is scaring me kind of a lot. If I start getting mail from a law firm, and end up involved in any kind of case, my parents will kill me. Eamil me at margaret@digital-crocus.com if you know, please.


Feb 23, 2004
5:20 PM  
rv36116 wrote:

My advice, don't do it if you're scared of the consequences. There's more of us who will do it.

And I'm going to see if I can't slap EMI around a bit with our site... :evil:

gimme 20 minutes and check what we mean... we'll have our streaming player have a "The Gray Album" genre... hmmm.... This could get interesting.


Feb 24, 2004
12:44 AM  
Philip Dhingra wrote:

I put up an mp3 of "Interlude" reversed that has the aforementioned "evil" lyrics. Check my site: http://www.philosophistry.com/

permlink:
http://www.philosophistry.com/archives/2004/02/001038.html


Feb 24, 2004
5:32 AM  
barlow wrote:

EMI is just asserting their copyright. You guys are glorifying the violation of the law. Work to change the law if you're unhappy with it, but breaking the law is just stupid. Danger Mouse should have secured all the rights for his source material if he wanted to produce this album. It's like you're blaming EMI that the DJ didn't do his homework. That's what being a professional is all about, and EMI owes it to all of its artists and shareholders to demonstrate a willingness to retaliate against infringement.


Feb 24, 2004
10:25 AM  
Ryan wrote:

Barlow, breaking the law is not stupid. It is a way of working to change it. I submit that an individual who breaks a law that conscience tells him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for the law. - Martin Luther King Jr.


Feb 24, 2004
10:47 AM  
Hazza wrote:

Barlow, what the fuck are you talking about? You don't think that companies try a fuck people over? Multi-nationals bend the law any way they can. The reason the law is the way it is, is because these companies have more of a voice than you and me, and because the US political system only cares responds to money. Copyright laws aren't there to protect people, but to protect business, and surely you can't believe that EMI would do you any favours...
One other thing - you say "work to change the law" tell me how the US political system would respond to calls for limiting the powers of business when you guys elect the likes of George Bush??


Feb 24, 2004
10:48 AM  
Yoda wrote:

Barlow is a fucking loser.


Feb 24, 2004
10:52 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

If you disagree with Barlow, I encourage you to comment on his entry about the Grey Album instead of mine. You'd just be preaching to the converted here.


Feb 24, 2004
11:15 AM  
Jason wrote:

To: Iceberg Tru Playa.
Pehaps you aren't aware of all the contrevesy surrounding the Beatles in their hay day. The whole "Paul is Dead" thing and others supposed messages, subliminal or otherwise. Perhaps the song title itself "Lucifer" did not tip you off.
If you consider todays music & violence argument.
And the "Backwars Message" crap they have been spewing since the 50's. For DM to put that into the track makes sense as a piece of the art, especially when you look at what he was putting together. There's a synergy about it. After all we're all big boys and girls. We know "killing catholics" and "leaving nigga's on death's door" are BAD things.... a couple of lines spoken softly in REVERSE shouldn't change that.


Feb 24, 2004
11:17 AM  
Jason wrote:

P.S. Yes, I know I am a lousy typist.. please forgive the 20 or so mistakes above :)


Feb 24, 2004
1:37 PM  
Fred wrote:

Keep up the good fight, Andy!


Feb 24, 2004
3:23 PM  
DJ Rascal wrote:

In the spirit of the occasion, here is a song I put together using bits of an old Bill Cosby routine from my childhood along with some music you might recognize (at least during the chorus). Enjoy and let me know what you think.

http://homepage.mac.com/rtremain/fileshare/

**Disclaimer: I'm not trying to make any money off of this. Nothing is for sale - just for fun.


Feb 25, 2004
4:00 AM  
Steve wrote:

Downloaded it, listened to it, didn't like it.
But I approve what you have done.


Feb 25, 2004
5:25 AM  
madeye wrote:

But aren't you missing the point of the MLK quote, Hazza? Someone who breaks the law--just or unjust--must be willing to accept the punishment.
But copyright law, while not perfect, is the best thing we've got right now for rewarding artists for their work. And comparing copyright laws to Jim Crow and segregation is the pinnacle of vanity. If you don't think that the music is worth your money, then you shouldn't go out of your way to listen to it.
The fact is that everybody--the RIAA and the pirates--are equally culpable in making the music we listen to crass and commercial. Yup. As music becomes free, the only way for artists to make money is going to be by lacing their music with
product placement.


Feb 25, 2004
5:54 AM  
MacDara wrote:

But copyright law, while not perfect, is the best thing we've got right now for rewarding artists for their work.

No it isn't. You're confusing the songs with the recordings. Artists on major labels rarely own the copyrights to their own recordings - since they were paid for by the label, the label owns the copyright. Surely at this stage it's a bit naive to presume that major labels are going to be fair in rewarding the artists for all the hard work they put in to make the recordings? After all, the average royalty rate is a paltry 12 percent, and stories of young bands trying to make it big but getting fucked over by the fat cats in the process are ten a penny. So in effect, copyright law as it stands only protects the labels, not the artists. Just ask Prince.

By all means, reward the artists for their work - buy independent music from labels that treat their rosters with the respect they deserve, or buy it direct from the artists if you can. But don't fool yourself by thinking you're supporting the artist when you buy a CD from a major label: the band might get a bagel for lunch or something, but the executives just put a down payment on a Lear jet.


Feb 25, 2004
8:50 AM  
elsa elentari wrote:

i know lots of people at ev1 since i live in houston and their HQ is 5 minutes from my home. last year ev1 attempted to sue my friends (www.headsurfer.net) and were kicked in the ass for their effort. fight the good fight.


Feb 25, 2004
8:56 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

I don't have any complaint with EV1 at all. In fact, EV1Servers is an excellent web host. My last host had uptime issues, and I was capped at 1.5 MBps. For the same amount of money per month, I get a more powerful box, an insanely fast pipe, perfect uptime, and 700GB/month. Highly recommended.


Feb 25, 2004
3:35 PM  
MegaStoffel wrote:

This is bull ... Just another case of combining big names to get attention. Next: The Exile Show (The Eminem Show + Exile On Main St.). + YES. artists should be able to stop people from messing with their work for the sake of attention. I for one don't want to hear a polka version of John Lennon's Imagine.

If you're so brilliant, write your own stuff.


Feb 25, 2004
4:09 PM  
Andre wrote:

Dear MegaStoffel: Exile On Main St. is chock full of great blues riffs (and songs) lifted from such acts as Robert Johnson and Slim Harpo. Why can't Keith Richards just write his own stuff? That slob.



And don't get me started on Led Zepplin. If someone told you that music wasn't partly about getting attention for yourself, they were lying.


Feb 25, 2004
6:15 PM  
ak wrote:

just found this site. sweet.


Feb 25, 2004
6:17 PM  
Wayne wrote:

You gotta be kidding me!
This stuff sucks.
The only saving grace for any of it is the Beatles samples. They were (are) true musicians and artists. To call this art is a joke.

There are a few areas where there's a spark of something interesting - very few areas, and very small sparks.

Mostly, it's dull, repetitive sampling that drones on and on...like the reviews.

Get a life - if you want true musical art buy the Beatles albums, or if you like droning boring rap, buy Jay-Z - but don't even intimate that this infantile blend is good or art.


Feb 25, 2004
9:18 PM  
jl wrote:

This is exciting. The major labels have too much power, there's too much media consolidation in our culture, and this fight is worth fighting. The way artists are exploited is disgusting and stifles creativity, and the way radio stations are run is even more of an outrage. Unless you're plugged into the system, you can't even get on the radio.


But... My personal opinion here: This music is just not good enough, on its own, to be the centerpiece of this fight. I have to wonder: Did Danger Mouse even try to get permission to sample the other artists' tracks? If he did, what happened? Did they just refuse? Were they willing to compromise? If he didn't, well-- what did he expect? Does he just want to appropriate someone else's music for free?


I do think there ought to be an easy way, a lawful way, for new artists to sample published music without having to call up a bunch of lawyers. It ought to be allowed for some fee, or some cut of the proceeds, or something. After all, if the original artists didn't make the music for free but actually used it to make a living, I think we owe that to them--even if they did it through a major label.


I absolutely agree that this system sucks and is being run by the money. Something's got to give. But the way to challenge the major-label system is not to start stealing other people's music! This fight would make more sense if Danger Mouse had just written his own music instead of making this unusual blend of other people's.

I hate to say it, because I do agree with the anti-corporate mission here, but I just don't buy what it says at the top of this page--that The Grey Album represents "the universe of creative works stifled by the United States' archaic copyright laws and the corporations that lobbied for them." Gimme a break!


Feb 25, 2004
11:17 PM  
BIGSPIDER9 wrote:

tell me where can i get the greyalbum


Feb 25, 2004
11:27 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

2 Live Crew's "As Nasty As They Wanna Be" wasn't exactly the best album in the world, but it ended up in a Supreme Court decision that set the precedent for the application of fair use in the modern era. Similarly, Hustler Magazine isn't exactly fine art, but it's crass parody of Jerry Falwell ended up strengthening free speech.


Feb 26, 2004
7:20 AM  
jl wrote:

Andy Baio, you make a damn good point. Damn good point. If this leads to changes in the music industry, then the details of the actual CD are irrelevant. I still wonder what changes we're looking for exactly. There seems to be an idea floating around that all music should be free from profit, and that we should make this point here. That's an ideal I admire, but can we at least acknowledge that we are so, so far from achieveing that? Maybe we can move the industry in the right direction with some specific suggestions about how to handle situations like the Grey Album and other artists who sample. That way, the folks supporting Danger Mouse wouldn't seem crassly self-serving. That's the paradox here: The more utopian you are, the more everyone else thinks you just want to get music for free. Whereas the more realistic you are, the more the bigwig types have to take you seriously. I bet there are plenty of copyright lawyers who would love to represent Danger Mouse, provided that he is willing to ask for specific changes in the law as opposed to a blank check. We need to find new ways to avoid kissing the feet of major studios every time someone wants to sample some published music. At the same time, the original money-making proposition has to be respected to some extent. I do think that having respect for artists means, in part, allowing them to make a living off their art--which is already way too hard to do in this society already.


Feb 26, 2004
9:47 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

I keep getting e-mails about this. You can still download the album at Illegal Art or many of the Grey Tuesday mirrors.


Feb 26, 2004
12:28 PM  
Darryl DeWald wrote:

You are so the f*%#kin' man!
Keep up the fight for artistic freedom.
The whole concept of "stolen" music is absurd.
Can you steal the sound of the wind, the rain?
God Bless.


Feb 26, 2004
9:03 PM  
Asa Wember wrote:

Thank you, all of you for standing up to EMI and symbolically, the shamelessy profiteering copywright-holding companies. I was in an extremely similar situation last May, and my orginization folded under the pressure and pulled back, beacuse regardless of the validity of their claims, they had the money and lawyers to put us (a small struggling non-profit theatre) through the legal ringer, and thus out of business. After the incident, the spirit of our orginization was crushed. It was as if they had a huge slab of concrete hanging over our heads ... not pleasant at all. So thank you for championing the cause of art and free expression, and standing up where I could not, and thank you for the posthumous vindication. -Asa


Feb 27, 2004
12:14 PM  
pennydinawoods wrote:

Love the album. I wish I knew about this protest earlier--my site's already gray.


Feb 27, 2004
3:23 PM  
Chza wrote:

I heard about this through nettime. It was well worth the time it took to download at 56k. Totally cool. I probably listened to it about ten times already. Fight the power.


Feb 27, 2004
5:36 PM  
Tyler wrote:

Danger Mouse is a unique talent who has created a masterpiece using two igenious works of music by masters of their generations...Thanx


Feb 28, 2004
6:01 AM  
The Truth wrote:

Wake up you clowns! The music companies are in business to make money with record sales and tours not to give songs away or discover half-assed DJ's.

Grow upand get a job.


Feb 28, 2004
7:02 AM  
Fred wrote:

Actually, I do have a job, TT. I'm a literary agent, representing those who actually create the works that are out there.

Music companies certainly are in business to make money, which is why we cannot let them decide how copyright should be used. Copyright exists for the creation of new creative works, and when it's being used as a club to keep down creative works (even creative works you don't like) then it needs to be changed.

As I've advocated elsewhere, changes in the compulsory licensing scheme needs to take place that allows a pro-rata fee to music publishers for the use of their material. As it is, we already have in place a structure for already published material (which allows bands to cover earlier songs without having to get permission). Changing that structure to allow for the re-use of recorded songs (not just written songs) is the next step.

But God forbid EMI would approve of a new revenue stream that they did not come up with first...


Feb 28, 2004
9:08 PM  
sapphire wrote:

awesome site, awesome entries...thanks for fighting the GOOD fight. keep us posted, brother.


Feb 28, 2004
11:28 PM  
Lee wrote:

The bootleg is just HOT!!
Anyone know if there is an even higher quality version?


Feb 29, 2004
9:15 AM  
ramdac wrote:

Way to go Andy. We'll be following suit shortly.


Feb 29, 2004
1:27 PM  
joe l. wrote:

Even though I'm in favor of Copyright laws in situations where they apply legally: I have to admit that sending cease & desist letters to those who simply //changed (or planned to change) the colors of their websites// is very inappropriate. I wonder how many of those who were planning that simple show of solidarity were put off by c & d threats that didn't apply to their situation?


Feb 29, 2004
7:34 PM  
Cheapbastard wrote:

Same here.. Looking for a higher quality version!


Mar 1, 2004
7:53 PM  
HDTV wrote:

It's an OK album, but I don't think it's great. Anyway, I'm currently mixing n-sync's bye-bye-bye with new kids on the block hanging-tough. It's the "shit brown" album. Look for it soon...


Mar 3, 2004
9:08 AM  
steve elliott wrote:

im not a rap or hip hop fan at all, though im a big beatles collector. when i heard about 'the grey album' i knew i had to download this one. i was right its a masterpeice. awesome, just awesome.cant wait for the next one!!!!


Mar 3, 2004
11:17 AM  
Cityslangbang wrote:


For anyone in Miami, Danger Mouse is doing a DJ set of the "The Grey Album" on Sunday, March 7th. at the Double Tree "Surfcomber" Hotel. I read he's in town as part of the M3 Music Conference. For those lucky enough to be there, this is going to be a one of a kind event, especially now that Danger Mouse is getting so much press.


Mar 5, 2004
7:51 AM  
Nicholas Elster wrote:

Am I too late? where can i get some grey?


Mar 5, 2004
2:59 PM  
Bob UK wrote:

This is history. Well done to EVERYONE hosting this. Anyone who says underground music is saturated and boring are clearly wrong, as Danger Mouse and all the Grey Album mirror sites have proven. It has proven to me, also, that the Internet is an imperative piece of technology in distribution of new music because, without it, how many people would be able to get the Grey Album anyway?


Mar 6, 2004
7:21 AM  
G wrote:

*sigh* I'm too late, since illegal-art.org has stopped offering the album, temporarily, at least. And I wanted to listen to it too...


Mar 6, 2004
11:11 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

The MP3s are still being hosted by several of the Grey Tuesday mirrors, like this one. You just have to dig around.


Mar 8, 2004
10:31 AM  
Anonymous wrote:

why do you keep doing a "cease-and-desist" on my comment? Fight da power!! or sumthing


Mar 8, 2004
10:42 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

Because you're trying to pimp your auction on my website.


Mar 8, 2004
10:43 PM  
Matt V wrote:

I got a new letter today. I'm actually kind of scared. I'm under 18 and my parents are going to flip


Mar 10, 2004
3:08 PM  
Cropper wrote:

I think its a bit shit how EMI have reacted to the grey album they sould sign him up.

Live on

Cropper (S.W.E.D)


Mar 12, 2004
7:59 AM  
elec wrote:

EMI can go F*%& themselves, I'll make sure from now on that I never BUY anything from EMI, I'll copy it, download it, anything but BUY it. Its a small contribution, but it's pretty much all I can do except sign petitions, and make sure more people hear the Grey Album, which is a great work of art, or music... Well done Danger Mouse, dont give up!


Mar 17, 2004
4:50 PM  
dan giudice wrote:

ive been searching and searching and i cant find it. whats the beatles song in my first song?


Mar 23, 2004
1:51 PM  
lucifervandross wrote:

These are the ALL BEATLE mashups

http://thekleptonesarestealing.songsfrom.us
or
http://www.geocities.com/ravenc_9


Mar 24, 2004
1:07 AM  
cdogs wrote:

OKAY... I have read some of the comments and what is the deal with fucking emi up the ass.... come on people! Something personal? Why be so negative?

You know there are laws for a reason, (emi) spends the money on producing and marketing music it's their right! it's how they earn a living - don't you think that people should not have the right to reproduce it's contents for what ever reason... we are talking simple principles! I understand that mouse whatever didn't use it to earn funds but he used it for his own personal gain - clearly more a publicity stunt than anything else... I personally haven't heard it and am not the slightest interested not a big jayz fan so his gimmick simply didn't captivate me!

I don't work for emi - a I am a bar manager that has a profound appreciacion for the arts...so don't get it mixed up... not a hater at all just a realist... start thinking like clear minded adults and you will see the truth too - I never steal music from the net - that is just tacky! I mean think about it, if you were an artist and someone was giving out cheap replicas of your work, wouldn't sit too well in your stomach.... huh?



Mar 24, 2004
1:30 AM  
cdogs wrote:

IN RESPONSE TO:

I think you're missing the point a little. Sampling is a very good thing and should be perfectly legal, not crushed under the iron fist of copyright law.
posted by Andy Baio on February 13, 2004 04:43 PM

Missing what point? why is sampling such a good thing?? why should it be leagal?? so it's okay to take a pablo picasso and spray paint it to create your version of art?? Or rather copy a couple of chapters from your favorite books to create your own little vision and then pass it off.... come on!


sampling takes away from the actual art form! your not creating anything you are taking something that is already there are putting it together with something else- they call it mixing right? yeah it's what I thought...


Mar 24, 2004
1:25 PM  
brian wrote:

it sounds good


Mar 25, 2004
12:43 AM  
hahahaha wrote:

Did you know that the birthday song is copyrighted......lol..thats funny.....how much money did the company lose on that one..


Mar 26, 2004
10:53 AM  
D-nice wrote:

I sold a couple Grey Album cds on eBay... Now I received a C & D letter. What should I do?


Mar 30, 2004
3:12 PM  
Craig wrote:

The Grey Album is all over the peer-to-peer servers, which makes it easy to pick it up. In all honesty, it's one of the freshest, most interesting lps I've hear in yonks. I have to agree with guy who said that EMI should have signed him up, instead of trying to sue his ass into the ground. I personally dont see how this lp could possibly harm the Beatles. I mean, if you own the Grey Album, it's not going to stop you from buying the White Album. In fact, it could work to the BEatles advantage, exposing the music to a new audience.


Apr 3, 2004
6:29 AM  
Jay Z fan wrote:

Dude, Danger Mouse just crwated a work of art that will never be forgotten.


Apr 4, 2004
9:46 AM  
Walter Moody wrote:

You did good son,real good.You opened the box,who's next. No music is dead only one's in da box is the one's who think the own the box. But then they think they still own people too.Hey,Bird Lives....for real,Play that funky free music,it's paid for.


Apr 7, 2004
8:08 PM  
Kap1 wrote:

Yo The Dec. 4th track is the hottest joint on the Grey Album!!


Apr 7, 2004
8:37 PM  
Kap1 wrote:

Jonathan Campbell is just a puppet on a string. I got a hundred bucks that says he gots the Grey Album on repeat in is small series benz.


Apr 13, 2004
2:16 PM  
Rev. Jesse Json wrote:

For everyone who's still looking for the grey album, this site still has it up (and is a lot faster than illegalart).
juniradio.net


Apr 15, 2004
1:17 PM  
michael akhimie wrote:

brilliant...man,just brilliant..an ill master piece...we should connect and fuck around some shit,how bout dat?fucking with hip hop from africa is sumthing i been doing man...holla @ me aight..michael akhimie a.k.a royal chef from nigeria,africa.
ps;here's a link to some of my cru's joint...one of the joints got romanians on em so sorry if u dont understand russian.cos i don't...


Apr 23, 2004
7:54 AM  
Drew wrote:

I was one of the few people who actually paid for the Grey Album (b4 it was widely distrubuted) and it's worth every penny. Not to mention it gives Hip-Hop fans the chance to see how talented the Beatles were in their prime.


Apr 27, 2004
11:29 PM  
Sib wrote:

fan of danger mouse but ......it's a hard listen jay z is difficult at the best of times all that flossy BS Gucci leg warmers & evisu jeans get ova it man. Mouse should of flipped the beats over his boy gemini's lyrics now that would have been DOPE.

anyhow cop the new ghostface cos that's some ill ish right now.

laters



Apr 30, 2004
7:31 AM  
Paul wrote:

Hey - stumbled across this album and it blew me away. I am a bit of a Jay-Z fan but didn’t have the Black Album, which I have now gone out and bought from HMV on the back of listening to Dangermouses take on it - so in the end Hov gets his $ and everyone is happy (except EMI who, by coming with the iron fist style, have managed to alienate themselves even further from the music buying public).


Apr 30, 2004
10:57 PM  
KiddoQstar wrote:

don't know if anyone's brought this up in response to your comment "Does this sort of preemptive cease-and-desists set a new precedent for record label action? Do website owners have to obey their demands, when they haven't even posted the album yet?"--but no. legally, this shouldn't be allowed, as it's a type of prior restraint, which isn't allowed in freedom of speech cases. since you hadn't posted it at the time, their exercise of this is prior restraint. just to let you know. hope it helps, because this grey album kicks ass, as do you.


May 1, 2004
12:06 PM  
gaz o'neill wrote:

listening to this album now. pure quality. cheers guys.


May 3, 2004
3:50 PM  
william_m_holla wrote:

I never got to hear the album, does anybody know who is still hostining it please?


May 4, 2004
8:08 PM  
Lil' Ness wrote:

I'm downloading/listening to the grey album right now and i have to say, this whole c&d thing is some bullshit. ok maybe the stopping you from putting the grey album on your site is reasonable, at most. but, trying to sue you for something that u didnt even get to do is crazy. that's like getting cuffed at the doors of a 7-11 because you just walked in with the idea of stealing something. it's rediculous. and for DJ Dangermouse, wow. i mean wow, the album is crazy. it's a combination of the king of rap with the king of bands. Jay-Z and the Beatles, i never thought i'd see the day. i think that DM shouldnt get sued for however much they're suing for. i think he should, at worst case scenario, have to pay a reasonable percentage of what he made off the album to, what is it, emi? then everybody goes home and listens to the grey album. they got their lil bullshit money that they dont need, and DJ Dangermouse doesnt get his shit reposessed by the government and paid to emi. the copyright infringement isnt about protecting the artist or band, it's about who owns the COPYRIGHT, in this case, EMI. the beatles dont even own the copyrights to their music. when u sign a contract, you turn over all your copyrights to the label for any music you make while signed to the label. so the label, not the beatles (who they're "protecting") gets the money anyways. they just want more money. damn, they act like if they dont sue him for all they can, they're gonna go bankrupt. in short, EMI can kiss my black ass, more power to you Dangermouse, and i'm turnin my blackplanet page grey lol.
~1~
Lil' Ness


May 4, 2004
8:13 PM  
Lil' Ness wrote:

p.s.- does anybody know where i can get or download the grey album?


May 14, 2004
3:30 AM  
Crew wrote:

If you guys are still looking for it, it appears to still be up here:

http://www.illegal-art.org/audio/grey.html


May 27, 2004
4:40 PM  
Sho 'Nuff wrote:

Damn I'm late. And dling Grey Album. Pretty good. I'm primarily a hip hop head, but I had recently been looking for some good Beatles songs. Good shit. And these are some of the most intelligent responses I've ever seen on an internet message board. Even the people disagreeing with Dangermouse and/or thinks this CD sucks. I reiterate: Good shit.


Jun 9, 2004
3:33 PM  
Simonkey London UK wrote:

Ive had the Grey album for a while, I got it through WinMX, but it should be easy enough through any P2P network. I think that a couple of songs on there actually beat The Black album for beats, What More Can I Say is pretty much permanently on for me; my iPaq, in the background of my Voicemail, my MP3 mobile ringtone... The guys at EMI are being cunts, but at the end of the day, Dangermouse should have got permission to sample, and they shouldnt sue him. If he wanted to make a name for himself, he shouldnt have sold a single copy without expecting the consequences. The boy did good with the mixes, and all blesseh for him in the future, but man, get a petition started or something, enough of you offering the downloads aint gonna stop him getting done for copyright infringement. If you guys appreciate the album so much, try helping the kid rather than going on about how you dont give a shit about EMI... Peace from Brixton...


Jun 17, 2004
10:00 AM  
...seltaeB ehT wrote:

I don't know much about hip-hop or whatever you call it. I do know though that you would not have anything without the Beatles... I read too about the backwards music and I can assure you it is not part of the White Album or devil music as such as one person pointed out that the Beatles may have had a hand in. EMI should get angry. You would not want someone knocking off your music or parts of it that you worked so hard on to perfect, and not get anything in return. This is just my opinion on the subject so don’t be knocking me down. To me the Grey Album seems okay maybe in the sense of the world of re-mixing, but this is not art. The White Album was art or so. This generation of music is not music anymore it’s just noise. That’s my opinion though. I’m not sure that the real Beatles would be too happy with the situations on this. ( i don' know why some of my word are weird looking)


Jul 5, 2004
4:45 AM  
Lil' Ness wrote:

hey, does anybody know where i can download the Brown Album, the lil Kev Brown remix? if u do, please email me @ lilness86@yahoo.com, or IM me at TDotKemp.
Thanx


Jul 18, 2004
11:15 AM  
Ryan wrote:

i dont know if someone asked already, but i cant make out all the Beatles songs used in the album. Does anyone have a listing of each Beatles song used in each Black album song? Aol instant Messnger flyingace83 if yah can help me out.


Sep 28, 2004
7:57 AM  
nicklondonuk wrote:

Would somebody please tell me when music got redefined as a form of expression formed purely from original material. How is it any less impressive for an artist to express himself by cutting and chopping at a masterpiece until it resembles nothing but his own feelings. This forum is a tribute to how much work Dangermouse did on the Beatles work... because nobody recognises any of the fucking tracks anyway!!! In response to a few earlier comments (from lucifer vandross and cdogs around March) how can you criticise art that you havent experienced lucifer? thats just ignorant and immature (and I honestly dont mean that in an offensive way). And to cdogs... if I saw a picasso painting that had been so passionately ripped apart and pieced back together to fit into a pollock picture and represent an entirely different set of emotions to those that picasso intended (see any parrallels to dangermouse... or have you not listened to the fucking album either!!!)then I would be no less impressed by the 'remix' than by the original painting. and lets not pretend that dangermouse has plagerised (as you suggested with your novel analogy) because that has never been an issue... even EMI would respect that he has done his own thing. That brings me on to my next point. EMI are not doing anything wrong in their own minds. They do not love music but money... but why should we expect anything else... thats how most of society feels. If dangermouse wants to express himself using the possessions of a money hungry empire then we must respect that he must comply or face the consequences. But it wouldnt hurt to put up a few petitions or something. Napster got way more support from us than poor old dangermouse. LETS HELP THIS KID!!!
Im also confused why so many of you are so sure that John, George and Paul (I dont think anyone would refute that dangermouse did wonders for Ringo's 10-year old drumming skills)would be angry at dangermouse. If anyone has heard their music from the Hamburg days (before they were signed and when tony sheridan was still in the band) they played gigs that were entirely comprised of covers. And they all found inspiration from far eastern culture, who knows how much inspiration?... bands like Pink Floyd and Matching Mole used samplers (i.e. samples of other artists work) as soon as they were a viable musical option. So why is it wrong just because dangermouse used 'the beatles'... that Princess Diana of the music industry that can never be touched or investigated but simply loved and treasured as part of our national and cultural heritage? FUCK THAT!!!


Sep 28, 2004
8:04 AM  
nicklondonuk wrote:

I would like to apologise to lucifer vandross, I misread the set out of the page... it was actually cdogs that posted BOTH of the comments I had an issue with. To be honest I was willing to forgive two different people for saying those separate things. But one person (who... and I cant stress this enough... HASNT EVEN LISTENED TO THE FUCKING ALBUM!!!) really should be shot for being so unwilling to accept a new art form that I can almost guarantee John would have not only accepted but embraced.


Oct 20, 2004
4:33 PM  
The real musiclover wrote:

The credit for all the great vibes is The Beatles, that is what you are all loving.

I'm taking nothing away from the musical assembler of the work in question, though i would not sample the Beatles as a matter of principle.
One of the best bands since the advent of popular music.


Oct 28, 2004
11:14 PM  
CPTG wrote:

I am not a fan of RAP/HIP HOP, Mash-ups or Bastard Pop. Truth be told, it is nothing more than musical vandalism---like when an ad agency takes the song My Sharona and overdubs "...I want my Rice-a-Roni". With that said, I can't wait to get my hands on Danger Mouse's Grey LP.

I LIVED when the Beatles were FRESH. When their shit was THE BOMB and was as vital to my well being as fresh air, food, sex and shelter (ok, maybe some drugs...). Their shit is so old, it doesn't stink---it rusts. I know every note, every flub, every cough and it is no longer vital to me because it is SO FUCK'N BORING. Danger Mouse now updates their sound and makes it happening again...he makes them RELAVENT AGAIN---and I am down with that. HOOAH!!!


Jan 23, 2005
10:28 PM  
keish wrote:

what up all. So i'm assuming we all know about what has been going on. Jay-Z believes he is god. he believes he is jehova which explains why he calls himself j-jova. He is far more intelligent than we give him credit for. If you don't believe this man thinks he is god and that all black men are god, do your homework. and what's worse, this man calls himself god on his roca-fella website. Jayz ... used to have respect for him heh not anymore


Jan 28, 2005
2:43 PM  
Kernit the Font wrote:

the album's still up at http://textz.com/greyalbum/ if anyone still needs it.


Apr 15, 2005
1:06 AM  
Anonymous wrote:

The grey album rocked and its cool that you are willing to support it, but the US has a copyright system that is fairly progressive and balances the creators rights with the public's desire for derivitive works. The last major revision to copyright law was in 1976 and mainly added an exception against infringement claims in the form of a codification of fair use.


May 4, 2005
8:03 PM  
FAN wrote:

DOES ANYONE KNOW WHO DREW THE ARTWORK FOR THE GREY ALBUM COVER?


May 14, 2005
12:12 PM  
Dan wrote:

the grey album combines two genres to create a perfect album. Why would anyone care these big companies are just trying to make more money. Danger good job with producing Gorillaz you kick ass


May 28, 2005
10:39 AM  
kilifimons wrote:

Damn, you took my idea! well, awright then, do it my dawg, do it, and do it hard. To blazes with EMI. on this one cause it's been a long , long , long time since the Beatles were more than Nostalgia. Old Folks music. to most of the kids they were the first Rolling Bones. Wicked man, Wicked.


Jun 5, 2005
7:12 PM  
daheiji wrote:

how ironic that EMI will now be making money off of Danger Mouse because he produced Gorillaz' new album Demon Days...


Aug 7, 2005
6:27 PM  
Anup Patel wrote:

Could someone please send me a copy of the grey album mp3's and not the torrent version - my sn is noopdog33@hotmail.com - Thanks.


Aug 10, 2005
8:25 AM  
brandon wrote:

Where can I find and listen to this album. I'm not very computer literate so I am having trouble getting this album, but I'm dying to hear it. Any help would be appreciated greatly.

brandonbritton37@yahoo.com


Aug 24, 2005
9:27 AM  
Colors wrote:

Were could I download a non-torrent, nor peer2peer, MP3 version of that Grey Album.

I found some ".ram" version but the MP3 conversion is just a catastrophy.

Colors


Nov 8, 2005
4:37 AM  
craigie b wrote:

i have heard loads about the grey album and guess what emi have now hired danger mouse to produce the goriallaz album doh who said bootlegging doesnt work. he got a major recording deal from it with the record company he booted

nice work mr mouse when the cats away the mouse will play supersize me craigie


Nov 10, 2005
2:07 AM  
Azloid wrote:

i finished dling that shiz, and it's a pretty good album. my last post, must be already toast. lol MCL.
Azloid.


Dec 8, 2005
5:37 PM  
Anonymous wrote:

What was done was take copyrighted work of two artists and fuse them together. While there is nothing wrong with that, the ORIGINAL artists who made that music (Jaz-Z and The Beatles) should have rights over that, its is THEIR music. Any profits, if any, should be payed to those artists.


Dec 12, 2005
11:35 PM  
freaknut wrote:

I'm not even into hip-hop (heavy metal, personally) and I love this ablum. I also happen to be a broadcasting major. Having studied music licensing law, I know the insane amount of money it takes to purchase the rights. While I don't want to go into the specifics right now, has anyone noticed that NOBODY IS PROFITTING from this? Which brings me to my next point: if it can be downloaded for free, and no one is bankrolling from previously licensed music, yet just enjoying it for the creative genius that it is, then WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? Has anyone heard Yoko's opinion of this?


Jan 3, 2006
2:01 AM  
gold wrote:

look i look at it like this dangermouse did something very creative beatles fans hate it some jay-z fans hate it some love it i personally think its art n he is talented for putting it together he didnt try to mass market it since their were only 600 copies made the fans did that for him its true underground hip hop expression to its fullest hate it or love it its art to its full extent dont take away the man creative outlet because u disagree with it if u listen to it its pretty well put together he took time to do it plus its not like jay-z n other rap artists dont encourage this they put accapella cd out all the time n beatles fans should look at it in the respect that its beatles music in a new light im not a jay-z fan but i think this is a good cd i downloaded it n i enjoy it you all should to just for the artist context it represents-


Jan 4, 2006
8:59 PM  
mitch24 wrote:

screw the govt. and screw paul mccartney. deep down we all know he's the one who shoulda' caught the bullet!it's nice though to see someone wearin' one of the ol' "beatles' wigs". anyway beatles rock..jay-z ( p.diddy puff ? B.S.) the f'in man plus he's got beyonce' . i want more anything that is good classic rock spit over by someone with talent ( no redman ) maybe some zep with o.d.b. please advise any site and i'll do same ........


Feb 3, 2006
8:07 AM  
paul wrote:

its was posted a while ago but if anybody is still wondering the artwork was done by justin hampton, who has gone on to do some major work with loads of other bands/people...see www.justinhampton.com


Feb 15, 2006
5:46 PM  
IresponsiBull wrote:

if anyone is concerned, you can still get the silver album [rjd2 and jay] if your willing to search thru hundreds of corrupted torrents, and limewire files that are no longer active, AND even want to empty time into soul seek, or you can IM me-
IresiponsiBull -AiM
IresponsiBull@Gmail.com -MSN and Google Talk
IresponsiBull -Yahoo!

i should have the grey album as well, finally found that one, the greatful dead/ jay album [jayzs dead] and i'm working on hunting down a couple others. IMM me, and i'll try to get you a link, or i'll just IM them strait to you. i'll take requests for other banned music too.. i need a challenge.. anything you're having trouble tracking down. i'm bored. IM me the album names... PLEASE


Apr 4, 2006
11:49 AM  
Leonard Lime wrote:

I've had the album for years and it does pour some interest back into some already decent songs. It's not Danger Mouses best work though. You'll see that within the next year, trust me. ;)


Apr 17, 2006
7:27 AM  
vince wrote:

why don't emi just licence it, and get some money for it? Maybe they've got enough already?


Apr 17, 2006
7:48 AM  
ldv wrote:

The Beatles only became as huge as they did because Brian Epstein and the band naively said 'yes' to every performance and merchandising tie-in possible, so that the media was blanket-covered in the image and sound of the band. Check out the band in their trademark (and very sell-able) moptops and matching suits. This was a band that weren't afraid of selling out and becoming public property. Now, EMI have put pay to that and are jealously guarding their nest egg. You won't find any Beatles music available to listen to on Amazon, etc. - as a result, EMI are consigning their prized possesion to the history books. This is a band that are still completely relevant to today's music, but whose legacy only lives on in sixties nostalgia. Let this music live - don't let The Beatles die.


Jul 17, 2006
8:01 PM  
Carson wrote:

where can i download mp3s of the grey album???


Jul 20, 2006
9:00 AM  
K wrote:

Literally bumped into Paul McCartney (shopping) in London a few days ago and after saying 'Sorry' and then double-taking, the only thing I could think of was asking 'What did you think of The Grey Album?'. He stopped and said 'Sorry?' and moved a bit closer. I repeated the question and he smiled big and said. 'Great One'.

I shit y'all not.


Jul 20, 2006
9:13 AM  
K wrote:

Oh yeah.. I 4got. Obviously been talking about the above quite a bit since it hapnd and I learned that Apple Corps, who control The Beatles' stuff and their solo stuff up to the mid-70's, have a blanket ban on sampling and advertising-use of their shit. This also fits in with their ploicy of never underselling The Beatles (ie. no 'reduced' offers, mid-price etc or featuring on compilations).

McCartney, meanwhile, is quite keen on sampling/re-use etc having done it himself (with Beatles outtakes) on his (uncredited) 2000 LP 'Liverpool Sound Collage' (collab with Youth, Super Furry Animals etc) and more recently in collab (as 'Twin Freaks') with Freelance Hellraiser on the album 'Twin Freaks'.

The thing is that on both of these LP's he was unable to license previously released Beatles or Wings content from himself because of the Apple blanket ban, Apple being co-owned by Mac, Ringo, Yoko, and Olivia Harrison, and administrated by a hardcore team of lawyers.

So getting Grey released legit wouldn't be up to EMI, as they haven't got ANY say on whether it can or not, but would depend on the agreement of the Apple directors and lawyrs PLUS the Jay Z team.

So..unlikely but then again, while all of this was going on, it turns out that the Fabs have been preapring their own mash-up of their own stuff for the new show in Vegas which just opened. Their own music in this has been taken apart by their old producers and put back together in ways which also amount to remixes and I think it's gonna come out on CD soon so maybe after that?


Feb 28, 2009
10:44 AM  
Coolyfett wrote:

Man you know this Grey Album is Historic!!!! I was never a Jay Z fan....I am a big Nasir Jones fan so you know how that went. Recently I was my local library just trying to find some new stuff to rip for the Iphone....found a John Lennon greatest hit joint...shit had some dope music on there so I start wiki Mr Lennon...which lead to the Beatles...which lead to the White Album....which lead to the "Grey Album"! The only thing I knew about DangerMouse was that he was the other dude in Gnarles Barkley....Knowing that he produced a Beatles Album featuring Jay Z is amazing. I am really feeling the Album cover as well, very creative. I now have the "Grey Album" in the Iphone!!! Thanks to Mr Lennon. Music was meant to be enjoyed. Peace & Love to everyone.


Aug 16, 2009
4:19 PM  
Mitch wrote:

Great album, worth burning an extra copy just to be safe.


May 26, 2010
3:14 PM  
JUJUB wrote:

I heard this album only once ( Bootleg) and since then have been trying to find it. does anyone know where i can get a good clean copy? PLZ HELP!


Dec 28, 2010
7:09 AM  
mrlubex wrote:

Honestly, I ended up here for outlandish reasons, partly because of my friend Steve.

I'm posting because there's only been two posts yet so far this year and one of them was by some other dude today. Some people would call that a synchronicity.

I talked to my girlfriend nili today, watched part of the movie fight club and just randomly decided to google danger mouse because I thought it was something bad. lol.

I've yet to hear the grey album, but I surely shall.

I'm going to miss this decade.

Spenser molnar .


 

Leave a comment





Waxy Links
Ads via The Deck
October 28, 2014
threaded — serious seizure warning (via)
October 27, 2014
OK Go's I Won't Let You Down — Segway chairs, drones, and umbrellas as an LED display
AdNauseum — browser add-on that works with Ad Block Plus, quietly clicking every blocked ad
October 26, 2014
WINDOWS 93 — don't miss the bookmarks in Cat Explorer (via)
October 24, 2014
Actually... — it's about ethics in game journalism
October 23, 2014
The race to save TwitPic's 800 million photos — documenting a huge chunk of Twitter's history, the founder's ignoring all offers of help
Ello takes $5.5M, binds itself to manifesto — unprecedented move, legally preventing them from running ads or selling user data
October 22, 2014
Felicia Day on Gamergate — she was doxxed minutes later in her own comments, which she disabled
October 21, 2014
Shia LaBeouf Live — Rob Cantor's classic track, with escalating insanity
Marcel the Shell with Shoes On returns — after a three year break from the first two adorable shorts
October 19, 2014
Cursors — collaborative multiplayer game
October 17, 2014
CVS BANGERS 3 — I will never tire of this
October 16, 2014
Getting Out of the Woods — a primer from Ryan Gantz on not being a music hater
October 15, 2014
Gamergate vs. ELIZA — some genius set up the classic chatbot to reply to #NotYourShield tweets
see hear party — GIF collage maker
Rothko Me — experiments with CSS filters inspired by Mark Rothko
October 14, 2014
Sincerity Machine — a Comic Sans typewriter
October 10, 2014
The Empire Strikes Back Uncut — fan-made, shot-for-shot remake, the sequel to the Emmy-winning Star Wars Uncut
Needs More JPEG — nostalgia for image compression artifacts
Ethan — an iOS app for messaging a guy named Ethan
October 9, 2014
Paul Ford on the creation of Tilde.club — $17.42 for a thousand web pages is a pretty good deal
October 8, 2014
Trouble at the Koolaid Point — Kathy Sierra's brilliant, upsetting deconstruction of her online harassment
Gina Trapani's XOXO talk — we started posting talks on Monday, with Kevin Kelly and Anita Sarkeesian
October 6, 2014
tildemash — I made this randomized mashup generator using isolated YouTube tracks; sorry, not sorry
Live coding VR with the Oculus Rift, WebVR, and Three.js — insane demo that makes Quadrilateral Cowboy look like a documentary
Twin Peaks returns — nine new episodes from David Lynch and Mark Frost
October 4, 2014
List of actual, real ethical concerns in videogames — not on the list: the friendships and sex lives of indie game devs and writers
October 3, 2014
New Homestar Runner: Fish Eye Lens — they appeared on Twitter last week, hope this means the return of Strongbad
Serial — the first This American Life spinoff, tracking a story across an entire season
October 2, 2014
Rolling Stone's profile of Adventure Time's Pendleton Ward — "having quality of life outweighed the need to control this project and make it great all the time"

Andy Baio lives here. Some rights reserved, for your pleasure.