Waxy.org
Waxy.org is the sandbox of Andy Baio. I run XOXO, built Playfic and Supercut, helped build Kickstarter, founded Upcoming, made an album, and some other stuff too.

Contact Me: Email, AOL IM, or follow me on Twitter.

New Video Overtakes "Evolution of Dance" for #1 Spot on YouTube

Posted Mar 5, 2008 (Updated Apr 9, 2008)

Yesterday, YouTube refreshed their leaderboards and a strange new video became the Most Viewed Video of All-Time, topping the world-famous Evolution of Dance video. With 89 million views, the new winner is a fan-made music video. But did it get there legitimately?

In early 2007, a popular Italian music community called Qoob.tv announced a contest for the Brazilian band CSS, in which fans could remix green-screen footage created by the band to create their own video for their song "Alcohol." Instead, an Italian music blogger and photographer named Clarus Bartel remixed the "Alcohol" footage for a different song, Music Is My Hot Hot Sex, the song made famous by the iPod Touch ad. Update: See our interview with the video's creator.

Since he uploaded the video to YouTube, it's accumulated a staggering 89 million views, at an average 265,500 views per day. (Though, as you'll see below, most of those viewers were in the last two months.) Not only would this make his video the most-viewed of all time, defeating runner-up The Evolution of Dance by over 12 million views, but it's also added more views-per-day than any video but Britney's latest single.

The commenters on the CSS video are baffled, many of them accusing foul play. I decided to look into it, to see if there was a method to determine if the number of views were somehow false.

One method of detecting suspicious view counts on YouTube would be to compare the ratio of social activity to the view count. If the number of ratings, comments, and favorites are much lower than other videos with similar views, then it's possible that the numbers have been artificially inflated.

Using the YouTube API, I retrieved statistics for the top 500 videos. I chose to compare the number of ratings, because comments can be turned off or removed by video owners and the number of favorites was unavailable in the API. The spreadsheet is below.


Download in Excel or CSV format.

If you look at the ratio of views-to-ratings, you'll see the CSS video has a very unusual 21,487-to-1 ratio. In other words, for every 21,487 views, someone leaves one rating. To compare, the average ratio for every other video in the top 10 is a more reasonable 590-to-1. This ratio is representative of other popular videos, too; the median ratio for the entire top 500 is 545-to-1. Skimming down the list, you can see some other strange videos that might raise eyebrows.

Many of the anomalies are videos embedded on extremely high-traffic sites, resulting in huge viewership but with very little social activity. For example, this video linked directly from Google Maps or this Rihanna promo ad from from her Myspace. In these cases, you can usually click on the "Links" on the video page to see where the traffic's coming from. But for the CSS video, and several others in the list, there's no clear source of where the external traffic could be coming from.

Using numbers pulled from around the web, I've found a few historical stats for the video. In the last few weeks, the CSS video is growing by 6-10 million views every five days.

February 25: 64,557,634 *
March 1: 76,216,419 *
March 3: 83,244,120 *
March 5: 89,174,590

Is this a guarantee that the numbers were faked? No, there's still a possibility that this torrent of traffic is coming from a legitimate external source, but it seems increasingly unlikely. I'm pretty sure it's either a bug or some form of cheating, but I'd love to hear theories.

(Huge thanks to Philip Rogosky for the tip and ongoing research.)

Update: With Philip's help, we've interviewed Clarus Bartel about his clip. After hearing his side, I don't believe he's involved in faking the numbers. That said, the numbers are still very suspicious. I'm trying to get in touch with YouTube to find out more about their methodology.

March 7: YouTube removed the CSS video from the Most Viewed chart, though didn't adjust the numbers on the video itself. No word from YouTube about why, but presumably they're investigating it.

March 18: After YouTube reinstated its place on the leaderboard, the video's creator removed it from the site. More here.

26 Comments (Add Yours)

Mar 5, 2008
4:18 AM  
zoomlines wrote:

nice detective work. sounds pretty fishy to me.


Mar 5, 2008
5:12 AM  
Stefan Hayden wrote:

definitely cheating. I've always found the amount of cheating on youtube staggering.

from inflated view counts to letting people misrepresent a video in the video thumbnail.

while most users take youtube's metrics pretty seriously I don't think youtube care one way or the other. They still are getting page views and sites inflate their traffic all the time.

Because of the video thumbnails I've found the "most viewed today" page useless. Youtube in general seems to have little interest in filtering out the good content from the bad.


Mar 5, 2008
5:37 AM  
Fred Blasdel wrote:

There appear to be other OMG HAX videos not shown in your infodump:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=12Z3J1uzd0Q
61,888,445 views, 8327 ratings


Mar 5, 2008
6:43 AM  
Jerk wrote:

Also, you should have noted that it is a crappy video. There's nothing noteworthy about it to be considered viral as EOD was, just a popular song and some crappy iMovie effects. Definitely hacking.


Mar 5, 2008
7:28 AM  
Matt Round wrote:

Maybe they've managed to get a hidden iframe containing the page into one or more popular sites?
XSS and malware could also be used to push a video up the rankings - [consults lawyer] - not that I'm suggesting anything so dubious is going on in this case.


Mar 5, 2008
11:07 AM  
Adam wrote:

Im not sure on this one.

It does seem wierd, but not impossible

It was an Ipod touch advert, so it got advertisement on the TV,

plus Brazil is a large country

and because it is now number 1, people watch it, and dont watch evolution of dance because they have watched it before.

but has like 25million views in 10 days.

might just be one of those things


Mar 5, 2008
11:10 AM  
Adam wrote:

Also it o many views because it had '??? VOTE OBAMA??' in the name

and some of the tags include, sexy, sex, barack, obama, ipod, hot, computer

which will all be very popular searches.

so i dont think it was hacked.


Mar 5, 2008
11:31 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

The CSS video didn't rank well for any of those searches, however. And keep in mind the sheer scale we're talking about... The will.i.am Yes We Can video's been seen worldwide, and it still only has 5.5 million views. The CSS video received more than that in the last two days.


Mar 5, 2008
1:13 PM  
rob wrote:

I did see it on Reddit the other day --> Some of it's publicity is the --> LOOK - a video overtook EOD... (And it's crap).

Cheating might be a good call though.. Although as someone says - brazil is a big country -


Mar 5, 2008
1:41 PM  
kosso wrote:

surely, just having 'hot sex' in the title will ensure that it will appear on many results, given 'normal' internet video-based content searches.


Mar 5, 2008
2:15 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

If you test it yourself on YouTube or a web-wide search engine, you'll see that the CSS video doesn't appear for any sex-related queries.


Mar 5, 2008
6:47 PM  
blabbinit wrote:

I can't even imagine something being viewed that many times. 89 million is a HUGE number. The title, I am sure, helps to push along the views.


Mar 6, 2008
5:13 PM  
david hung wrote:

if you notice on your spreadsheet, the video "xxx" has about 3000 views per comment. It is possible that since the song is in the ipod touch ad, that asian viewers of the video, i.e. china, are running up the views


Mar 6, 2008
9:37 PM  
zombi wrote:

why not just be happy for CSS? it finally kicked out emo ho's MCR, rihanna the retarted, and SOULJA BOY! (along with avril, and that dance thing) this is actually something GOOD! come on! youtube is just being a prick caus it just CAME-OUT-OF-NOWHERE success


Mar 7, 2008
12:21 PM  
zoza wrote:

not to mention that every time a website like yours mentions it, another shitload of people go and check it out.


Mar 8, 2008
4:13 AM  
jansegers wrote:

I could believe it's a genuine view start number.

Being number one, having that title, having those tags, being promoted on Reddit and now all the controversy about it.

I've said view start number, not views, because I've not watch even 1/4 of it.

But like I clicked on it, it just will be counted as a view, probably.

[The Rojo Newsletter talked about it and I was kind of curious, so I clicked anyway.]

It would be worth while to analyse this case more closely.

How was it promoted ? some SEO lessons to be learnt !

And the second positive consequence is this question:

Any chance for getting the completedly viewed numbers on videos ?

[the number of complete views of a video are much better indicators of quality than the number of started views, if you ask me]

Pieter Jansegers


Mar 8, 2008
11:45 AM  
david hung wrote:

i think that the comment analysis is flawed. in china most computer use is in cyber cafe, to comment on youtube you have to login, most chinese wont do this.


Mar 8, 2008
12:11 PM  
Andy Baio wrote:

That's entirely possible for the "xxx" video... I didn't consider that. Thanks for the feedback.


Mar 9, 2008
4:48 PM  
Rhett wrote:

The video no longer seems to be on the leader board?


Mar 10, 2008
2:09 PM  
Justin wrote:

A agree that the most significant data point is a subjective one: this video just plain sucks.


Mar 13, 2008
6:54 PM  
Falso wrote:

I don't want to spoil CSS fun, neither think that they have anything to do with this, but have you noticed that 16+ million views from the video came from this URL? http://hi5.qloud.com/profileBox/profileBox.swf

It seems like an application that can automatically embed videos on social networking sites... And if it can put a YouTube video on autoplay on a lot of profiles, maybe you can do the trick.


Mar 15, 2008
2:32 PM  
Ian wrote:

Pode até ser uma fraude o número de acessos, mas a musica e o vídeo realmente são bons alem do charme e beleza das garotas.


Jul 2, 2008
3:09 PM  
Torley Lives wrote:

Cool research — thanks for sharing it and digging in deep.

@Andy, do you have a tutorial on how you used the YouTube API then made this spreadsheet? I didn't know it could be used to acquire stats like that.

Many thanks in advance!


Jul 3, 2008
5:44 PM  
Robert M wrote:

Remember, youtube is illegal in China, so throw the views from there right out, cyber cafe/logged in or not.
I would say this is a great example of view fraud.

i would say that we should all learn from their example.

i think we should all do the same, cause youtube to crash from global bandwidth saturation (taking a few small wired countries with it) and destabilize google's stock price, bringing about a stock market crash, financial collapse, and the ushering in of the apocalypse.

Or, maybe you'd just have the most viewed video on youtube, but....THAT is just WAY to AMBITIOUS!!

Lulz!


Jul 7, 2008
8:01 AM  
Andy Baio wrote:

@Torley I just used the API for searching videos to grab 50 videos at a time ordered by view count, then grabbed the date and number of views for each. Easy.


Mar 22, 2009
1:42 PM  
Nicole m wrote:

I love the evoultion dance


 

Leave a comment





Waxy Links
Ads via The Deck
June 17, 2013
Battle for the planet of the APIs — "If those services don't trust me enough to give me an RSS feed, why should I trust them with my data?"
Edward Snowden live Q&A — Cosmo asks the tough questions
June 15, 2013
Instant Server — intantly spin up an Ubuntu server with a built-in terminal for 35 free minutes (via)
June 14, 2013
Google's Project Loon — high-altitude balloons with Internet access for rural and remote areas (via)
Matt Haughey on Gmail's Organized Inbox — just enabled it, and it's instantly useful
The Internet of Actual Things — "Your light bulbs will narrate their agonizing deaths."
Sci-Fi Corridor Archive — so many octagons (via)
We See In Every Direction — Jonas Lund built a massively-multiplayer web browser (via)
Filmmaker sues to prove Happy Birthday To You is public domain — and, best of all, they want Warner to pay back millions in undeserved licensing fees
NYT on how Yahoo tried to fight PRISM in court — related: the story of one CEO that defied NSA wiretap orders
June 13, 2013
Profile of NYC teen who speaks 20 languages — part of THNKR's prodigy series (via)
Apple's short film on the personal impact of four iOS apps — helps to explain why this app can cost $220 and still have four stars
Wemoji — reenact emoji icons with your webcam; more unlock as photos are added
Foursquare Time Machine — don't miss the infographic it generates in the "Share My Stats" section
Stamen's Map Stack — powerful photo filters for map design
Venus Patrol's Horizon press conference — stunning lineup of upcoming artful indie games, an antidote to E3 ego and bluster
Jony Ive Redesigns Things — apparently, I started a meme
George Lucas and Steven Spielberg on the future of film — "out of that chaos will come some really amazing things... because all the gatekeepers have been killed!"
John Martz ends Drawn — don't know how I missed this, but I'm sad to see it go
June 12, 2013
Kyle McDonald's Caricature — automatically generating caricatures based on motion
Geek vs. Nerd — analyzing 68k tweets to see how the terms are used
June 11, 2013
Author Hugh Howey on the future of self-publishing — widely applicable across all indie art and tech
ScummVM ported to Javascript — ported with Emscripten, audio's Firefox-only for now
Frank Chimero on the iOS 7 redesign and perspective — also, Leo Drapeau's quick icon redesign
In Defense of Art Games — fantastic Ignite talk by Owen Goss; links to the cited games
June 10, 2013
The Pirate Cinema — turning film torrents into a cut-up art installation
Dan Sinker on getting his phone tapped in 1999 — not a great feeling
Apple's major WWDC announcements — new iOS and OS X, free ad-supported Pandora competitor
Edward Snowden, NSA whistleblower, outs himself — don't miss the video
June 6, 2013
Why phone call metadata matters — who you call is often as significant as what you say

Andy Baio lives here. Some rights reserved, for your pleasure.